3 ms·

Really most of your post here is answered by the later fifth or so of the post you're responding to. I would reread that part. Models output very similar work

Really most of your post here is answered by the later fifth or so of the post you're responding to. I would reread that part. Models output very similar work to training data at times, even identical in some cases, but the vast majority of it is different enough to not be derived work. The DCMA act effects public uses of art like YouTube. This sort of copyright where you can regulate how it's used does not exist in any form currently.

freejazz 4y ago
US copyright law gives authors control to prevent others from utilizing their works outside of the contexts that are considered fair use. Your characterization is facially incorrect.
- bioemerl 4y ago
  Such as? Every example to date I've seen regards the copying or distribution of a product, not its use once it's in someone's hands.
  - freejazz 4y ago
    Those are things that require it being in someone's hands, so I'm really by your post.
    - bioemerl 4y ago
      Because we are talking about uses not involving copy or distribution of a work. The use of the images to train an AI - such uses have never been protected.
      - freejazz 4y ago
        Not the extent it involves copying or distributing, which it arguably does both of .