3 ms·

Just to be clear though, you will just be getting Blink/Gecko’s rendering issues instead.

• rattray 4y ago
  You'd be getting the ability to choose which rendering issues you went to experience for any given website, which is actually quite useful.
• rektide 4y ago
  Ideally or potentially Firefoxes or potentially say Servos or any other browser of choice. As opposed to the very-low not-so-common denominator of this anti-invested in naughty stepchild of the Apple 30% rent-stealing profit-garden that is modern Apple.
• CitizenKane 4y ago
  Which is true, but they're much less prominent overall. Mobile Safari is quirky to say the least and is truly the IE of the present day.
  • isodev 4y ago
    Are they really? Safari is currently leading Interop 2022 https://wpt.fyi/interop-2022 https://wpt.fyi/interop-2022
    • lxgr 4y ago
      Given how vast the modern web specifications are, you could really be 99% compliant but provide a pretty mediocre experience to your users, or vice versa. For example, I use Firefox as my main browser, and the lack of e.g. proper WebAuthN support on macOS has a much, much higher impact to me (and is making me consider switching), whereas I couldn't care less about e.g. WebUSB (which I do occasionally use, but I'm fine switching to Chrome for that use case). To get an accurate picture, you'd have to somehow weigh all of these various standards and features in a way that not only accurately presents actual users, but also their relative importance (i.e. do websites trying to use something fail gracefully, or do I effectively have to use another browser to get achieve what I'm there for).