4 ms·
Imaging and storage used to be much more expensive, so if this decision was to be reviewed today, I am pretty sure regulators would start requiring it. Just be
by bluepizza 4y ago
Imaging and storage used to be much more expensive, so if this decision was to be reviewed today, I am pretty sure regulators would start requiring it.
Just because things are as they are, doesn't mean that they couldn't be better.
- nradov 4y agoNah. External cameras wouldn't do anything significant to improve safety or help with crash investigations so there's no reason for the FAA to impose such a requirement. It's just a silly idea. But regulators do revisit existing rules all the time. If you really want this then feel free to file a formal petition for rulemaking. If you do that then they'll have to at least look at it. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/petition https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/petition