6 ms·

How are you going to tell if it accurately analyzed a legal document if you don't know how to accurately analyze a legal document? It's a tool that's being sold

How are you going to tell if it accurately analyzed a legal document if you don't know how to accurately analyze a legal document? It's a tool that's being sold for jobs it shouldn't be doing, if that's the characterization that helps you understand the issue and not turn this into "blaming the tool for something it shouldn't be doing"

worik 4y ago
[flagged]
- freejazz 4y ago
  Perhaps you have issues with reading comprehension? This is a thread about how chatGPT is being sold as a service to analyze legal documents, and it quite obviously fails at that. If your solution is to see a lawyer you are making my point that chatGPT is not helpful for this thing that people are saying chatGPT is helpful for.
  - worik 4y ago
    > Perhaps you have issues with reading comprehension? This is a thread about how chatGPT is being sold as a service to analyze legal documents No it is not
    - freejazz 4y ago
      Certainly my posts were and it's a mystery as to what point you think you are achieving by trying to debate something with me that I was never discussing
      - worik 4y ago
        Hire a lawyer Directly addresses your concerns This thread started out on cover letters
        freejazz 4y ago
        Okay but I posted about the examples of chatGPT giving legal advice, so there's something you fundamentally don't seem to be grasping about the pointlessness of you talking to me about resumes.
iinnPP 4y ago
Ask and verify or integrate with a tool that cuts the inaccuracies out. Sometimes that is not possible. There are plenty of pieces of the legal system that would benefit, today, from adding a well-made ChatGPT process. Perhaps not perfectly, in such a flawed system. As an example, ChatGPT could assess the actions leading to a charge and compare the law to the actions of an individual. Before you bash the idea, I happen to know of a case where ChatGPT outperformed the US Federal government in this analysis. 1 success is worth the cost.
- freejazz 4y ago
  Wow what an amazing and impossible to argue against anecdote that defies any examples I've seen.

worik 4y ago

[flagged]

freejazz 4y ago
Perhaps you have issues with reading comprehension? This is a thread about how chatGPT is being sold as a service to analyze legal documents, and it quite obviously fails at that. If your solution is to see a lawyer you are making my point that chatGPT is not helpful for this thing that people are saying chatGPT is helpful for.
- worik 4y ago
  > Perhaps you have issues with reading comprehension? This is a thread about how chatGPT is being sold as a service to analyze legal documents No it is not
  - freejazz 4y ago
    Certainly my posts were and it's a mystery as to what point you think you are achieving by trying to debate something with me that I was never discussing
    - worik 4y ago
      Hire a lawyer Directly addresses your concerns This thread started out on cover letters
      - freejazz 4y ago
        Okay but I posted about the examples of chatGPT giving legal advice, so there's something you fundamentally don't seem to be grasping about the pointlessness of you talking to me about resumes.

iinnPP 4y ago

Ask and verify or integrate with a tool that cuts the inaccuracies out. Sometimes that is not possible. There are plenty of pieces of the legal system that would benefit, today, from adding a well-made ChatGPT process. Perhaps not perfectly, in such a flawed system. As an example, ChatGPT could assess the actions leading to a charge and compare the law to the actions of an individual. Before you bash the idea, I happen to know of a case where ChatGPT outperformed the US Federal government in this analysis. 1 success is worth the cost.

freejazz 4y ago
Wow what an amazing and impossible to argue against anecdote that defies any examples I've seen.