20 ms·
> despite not having a good mechanistic explanation for why YT is OK even at small dosages Do you have an explanation for YT is NOT ok even at small dosages?
by shawabawa3 4y ago
> despite not having a good mechanistic explanation for why YT is OK even at small dosages
Do you have an explanation for YT is NOT ok even at small dosages?
- rTX5CMRXIfFG 4y agoDid we miss out on all of the HN articles and studies about how socmed consumption negatively impacts people’s levels of happiness, self-esteem, and ability to focus, and have we no experience of it?
- watwut 4y agoThe actual studies are way more nuanced then that. It is actually funny to compare what actual studies, whether sociological or psychological say and what gets written on HN.
- TeMPOraL 4y agoWe didn't, we just read and understood it - in particular, just because a site is classified "socmed", doesn't mean any kind of contact with it will instantly materialize those negative impacts you mention. Or that just because a site is classified "vod", it's substantially safer. YouTube is mostly just a video-on-demand site. The social aspects are immaterial to how kids use the platform.
- rTX5CMRXIfFG 4y agoNo, it’s not instant. As a matter of fact it starts with a click, then another, then another, and before you know it you’ve lost an hour just doom-scrolling low-intelligence content.