4 ms·
> We certainly need decentralized systems that cannot be controlled by EU, US, or any government/entity. No. If such a system could work in any meaningful way,
by atmosx 4y ago
> We certainly need decentralized systems that cannot be controlled by EU, US, or any government/entity.
No. If such a system could work in any meaningful way, it would be already in place.
Trying to fight legal frameworks with technology, failed in the past with some notable but hardly repeatable exceptions. In the 90s a few geeks tech awareness could match the resources of a small state, non tech-savvy state. Nowadays it is impossible because the discrepancy in resources is huge.
There are countries that force you to download their own "secure" SSL certificate, so they can sniff all traffic. China is the worst and most prominent example.
This battle need to be fought on the street, with votes, by raising awareness, etc. If we want to be "free" we need to take-over the political battle, not the tech battle because if we win on that front, most likely won't matter. I don't want to risk jail for using an open source encryption tool.
- humanizersequel 4y ago>No. If such a system could work in any meaningful way, it would be already in place. I'm reminded of the EMH joke about the economist walking by a 100 dollar bill on the street, assuming that it must be fake because if it were real, someone already would have picked it up.
- atmosx 4y agoWhat is EMH? Sounds like a crypto convention to me.
- boring_twenties 4y agoEfficient Markets Hypothesis