3 ms·
That's actually extremely impressive, even for chat GPT. Not only is it a coherent scene, the humour emerges from a disagreement about an incidental detail in t
by dbspin 4y ago
That's actually extremely impressive, even for chat GPT. Not only is it a coherent scene, the humour emerges from a disagreement about an incidental detail in the lived environment. While situated in a realistic situation that's typical of the series. With the detail in question being a real environmental detail of that situation. George is irate and Jerry sarcastically winds him up. It literally could be segment from a real episode (bar the ending). So we have (an impersonation of) theory of mind, coherent understanding of setting, a narrative structure etc.
Compared to the infinite Seinfeld, which appears composed of disconnected setup -> response type gags, it's night and day.
- kerpotgh 4y ago[dead]
- marcosdumay 4y agoHum, yes, it is impressive, but... > While situated in a realistic situation that's typical of the series. That's a bit of a low bar. > With the detail in question being a real environmental detail of that situation. George is irate and Jerry sarcastically winds him up. And that's what you typically get from trying to replicate statistical data from the series. It's a very good impersonation of a theory of mind, but it's an impersonation. The most surprising part is that when asked for a Seinfield episode, it actually tries to construct a Seinfield episode. But somehow, that's that part that least impress most people.