3 ms·
Will this "premium" version include fixes for all the obvious and terrible bugs people keep complaining about? They're barely acceptable for a free product. If
by solarkraft 4y ago
Will this "premium" version include fixes for all the obvious and terrible bugs people keep complaining about? They're barely acceptable for a free product.
If they can spend billions on AI maybe they can assign like ONE person to caring about Teams??
- hooby 4y agoLook at the history of past Microsoft chat products... and then name one they didn't run slowly into the ground and then replace with something else! - MSN Messenger - Windows Live Messenger - Microsoft Office Communications - Microsoft V-Chat - Microsoft Lync - Skype - Skype for Business (nothing to do with Skype - completely different software) - Microsoft Classroom - Windows Meeting Space - Microsoft NetMeeting - Microsoft Office Live Meeting etc. Why would you expect Teams to fare differently?
- Sakos 4y agoMSN Messenger was great and significantly better than the abomination that is Teams. Was Teams ever good?
- rfqd 4y agoThere definitely was a point when I thought that, yes, this is a new product and it is looking good, give it another year or so to get the kinks out. But then they removed features they got right the first time, like fullscreen screen sharing with their New Experience. They also added more and more half-baked poducts with rapidly changing apis and the like. From then on I was convinced that they in fact didn't want to learn what Slack/Discord/etc. did right and just go their usual MS way.
- rjh29 4y agoMSN Messenger was good for a short period, then got increasingly bloated and horrible and I had to switch to alternative clients like Trillian. I remember someone released a hacked version of Messenger with all the bloat stripped out, too. I see what you mean though. I don't remember Teams ever being good.