4 ms·

Ah, this title makes more sense. After all, humans are bullshit generators to, and can occasionally be useful.

• bamboozled 4y ago
  So the thing is, we don’t want an automated bullshit generator ?
  • teawrecks 4y ago
    Our scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could...
  • dsabanin 4y ago
    If seriously, it definitely does not just generate bullshit, and there is no indication that it's not going to improve dramatically in a few years, augmented by other models. You have to start somewhere. Google and others apparently have more powerful models already, but they don't release them. I remember days when reliable voice recognition was thought of as nearly impossible, and here we are. I believe that the "bullshit" part is a brief, temporary phase.
    • orwin 4y ago
      I mean, I used Copilot more, but it's 99% bullshit. The only Ai I paid for was Wolfram Alpha and that's the only AI that outperform me. Even for dumb react code, it will use classes rather than hooks. It's basically useless with dynamically typed languages and use old syntaxes. I do not see the use case right now. At all.
      • dsabanin 4y ago
        I think it also has something to do with the corpus – most JS/TS/React code is utter garbage. The model learned to code from inexperienced coders. I see different results in Scala, Dart, Rust, etc.