4 ms·
"shut up you luddite, it's perfectly acceptable for your artist job to be automated away, progress is inevitable and all of your objections about how this is pl
by egypturnash 4y ago
"shut up you luddite, it's perfectly acceptable for your artist job to be automated away, progress is inevitable and all of your objections about how this is playing fast and loose with copyright are meaningless" is pretty much what I get from a lot of Hacker News when I talk about how AI art is not making me happy for the future prospects of my field.
- photonbucket 4y agoI think these artists should be able to prohibit their work being used in a training set Somewhat related - how does copyright work on the output of these AIs? Can a piece of code be the copyright owner of a picture?
- chii 4y ago> how does copyright work on the output of these AIs? the person who pressed the button to start the AI generation for that particular output _should_ own the copyright to it (and also be liable for the infringement if it does).
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- detaro 4y ago> Can a piece of code be the copyright owner of a picture? No. Copyright requires a human creator.