8 ms·

What do you mean by "dishonerable" here? Is this an instance of how Americans love the military so much that it's difficult to understand for people from other

• coeneedell 4y ago
  No matter what country you’re in, the military is in a position of authority (except maybe Costa Rica). Generally people consider a lie to be worse if it’s a lie you can use to get power.
  • xkqd 4y ago
    And usually a position of sacrifice. Therefore, it’s pretty respected over here and making a false claim is pretty taboo. Definitely taboo enough to get you chewed out, and almost enough to risk a physical altercation.
    • scarface74 4y ago
      I once ran a 5K as part of an Army fundraiser. It was for civilians. The Army gave every runner a T-shirt with the Army logo very prominent. Someone asked me when I was in the Army and not thinking about why they asked I just said I wasn’t. They almost started to chew me out until I mentioned it was given to me as part of an Army sponsored fundraiser.
      • waltbosz 4y ago
        Reminds me of a time in 7th grade when I wore a band t-shirt that I had received as a gift. A kid in my class took exception because he doubted that I even owned any of their albums. The kid called me a "poser". It also makes me think of my uncle who is a very proud labor union member. He gets upset if anyone says anything disparaging about labor unions. My point is, it sounds to me like people taking honor in being a member of an exclusive club, and they don't like it if other people do things to belittle their club membership, like by pretending to be a member. I wonder if there is some psychological term for that behavior.
        • projektfu 4y ago
          Maybe it falls more under group dynamics/sociology. Interesting question.
        • tekknik 4y ago
          Your comment is rather offensive. Stolen valor is a crime. Wearing a band t-shirt while not listening to the band is not. Military members risk their lives for others. People that do this get respect, be it a Dr, Military, Police, etc.
          • dragonwriter 4y ago
            > Stolen valor is a crime. A civilian wearing an army T-shirt is not “stolen valor” in the sense that stolen valor is a crime, so this is, at best, equivocation. While I believe (but I don’t feel like checking the UCMJ) there is a much more extensive crime (or set of crimes) relating to stolen valor within the military, the crime of stolen valor that it is possible for a civilian to commit consists of, and (outside of selling military decorations) only of, fraudulently claiming one of narrow set of awards with the intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit, specifically: a Congressional Medal of Honor, a distinguished-service cross, a Navy cross, an Air Force cross, a silver star, a Purple Heart, a Combat Infantryman’s Badge, a Combat Action Badge, a Combat Medical Badge, a Combat Action Ribbon, a Combat Action Medal, or any replacement or duplicate medal for such medal as authorized by law. 18 USC Sec. 704.
            • tekknik 4y ago
              I didn’t say a civilian wearing an army shirt is stolen valor, however pretending to haven been in the military while never having been is. Wearing a band shirt and an army shirt are not comparable at all. The default thought when someone sees someone wearing a military shirt is “oh they were in the military”. The thought when wearing a band shirt certainly wasn’t “oh they must be in the who”.
              • dragonwriter 4y ago
  • quesera 4y ago
    > No matter what country you’re in, the military is in a position of authority In the United States, the military has no authority over citizens. It's a foundational law. Exceptions can be made under temporary and unusual circumstances.
  • sandworm101 4y ago
    Authority isnt the word. Im in the military and that gives me absolutely zero authority in civilian life. It would be a crime for me to even attempt to wield such. But i do expect a modicum of extra respect for people who give up time/money/priviledges of civilian life in order to serve thier country. I dont expect cops to let me get away with speeding, but i do expect them not to detain me by the roadside in uniform for a "random" check.
    • z3c0 4y ago
      I agree with you overall, but that "serve their country" line makes me cringe every time. The military's operations are vast and numerous, but also politically-motivated and, at times, disgustingly utilitarian. Obviously, no grunt should bear that burden, but I feel better served by the post office.
      • sandworm101 4y ago
        It is cringe worthy, but when you get orders for a multi-year posting far away from friends and family, it really does feel like servitude. It was -30 outside this morning. My car hates me for bringing it here.
        • z3c0 4y ago
          Without a doubt, it is servitude, but I feel it downplays the plight of servicemen like yourself to roll it up into that "of country". The expended lives towards obtuse ends is far more tragic than that of something noble like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I wish you luck on your tour, wherever it is.
          • sicp-enjoyer 4y ago
            Do you think the soldiers should see themselves as capitalists in it for themselves?
            • 4y ago
  • tengwar2 4y ago
    I disagree. I can't think of any western country where the military are in a position of authority. It's something we have got rid of over the past 50 years, with the end of the juntas in Greece, Spain, and Argentina; Franco's Spain; and so on. There are some countries where the military are not running the place, but are "kingmakers", but I can't think of any western ones.
    • teknico 4y ago
      Italy is such a western country. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carabinieri https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carabinieri
• WXLCKNO 4y ago
  I think that's what he means too. Other people are talking about sacrifice. It's a job, like any other job. People do it because they want to get paid and military worship is ridiculous.
  • influx 4y ago
    Serving in the military is different from other jobs as soldiers may be sent to dangerous situations where there is a risk of death. Although many Americans believe the decisions made by politicians that put military personnel in harm's way have not been good, this does not take away from the bravery of those who voluntarily choose to serve their country.
    • WXLCKNO 4y ago
      "Voluntarily" They need a job and being a soldier is a job. A glorified one where words like bravery and valor are thrown around in the US to make people accept risking their life in a noble way. And I realize that some people will actually be driven by these ideals and there are things like military families where this tradition is actually strong and it gives them purpose but for the average soldier, they just needed a job and the propaganda worked.
• mojomark 4y ago
  Hard to answer this without delving down a political rabbithole. In the USA, there is sentiment for both military service members (not to be conflated necessarily with the military industrial complex or military campaigns), "first responders" (police, firefighters, EMS and hospital workers, etc.). The sentiment for the military and first responders is that they either have already, or could at any moment, be called upon to put their health and life at risk on behalf of the rest of us citizens and allies - so that the rest of us can live a free and peaceful life in pursuit of happiness. The sentiment is one of sincere gratitude of the deepest variety. I personally don't think the existence of this ID card mocking the DoD is anything but harmless fun. In fact, the freedom to make such content is a part of the freedom of speech the DoD works to protect. However, as much as I enjoy Woz, I agree that giving a false ID to someone a law enforcement agent who is simply trying to do their job, isn't smart or too funny, it's intentionally obfuscating a process and stealing time (tax payer dollars) from the agent trying to do their potentially deangerous job and prosecute true bad actors. Law enforcement in the US is far from perfect, and trust me, there's a place and value to peaceful civil dissobedience. However, there's also a psychological and monetary cost. The costs of Woz's act seem very benign to me, but I can see how others could easily get spun-up about it - especially if your job is law enforcement.
• quesera 4y ago
  Americans want to believe. Call it "optimism", if you're feeling generous. American exceptionalism is a thing to believe in which satisfies all of the needs of a believer. It's part of the belief triad "god-family-country". The military is an extension of the country. There is very little visible military presence in the US, and the military has no role in civilian affairs except in cases of temporary callup for natural disasters etc. And yet it's a very big military, so everyone has some adjacency to present or historical members of the military. In short, it's the perfect object of optimistic belief. The military is consistently the "most trusted" part of American society -- perhaps because all the things it does, it does elsewhere. And for the most part, American foreign policy is pretty similar across political lines, so there's no inherent partisan rift, making it an easy and safe thing for everyone to agree on. A foreigner might argue that that is a flimsy basis for belief. They might point to some tragic events visited upon the world by the US military. They might say that Normandy was a long time ago and it doesn't justify everything that's happened since then. Many Americans would agree with that. But that's the outsider's view. First and foremost, internally, the military is a jobs program. And it's very very good at that! Tons of training and education, incredible amounts of commerce and technology, genuine personal development, and on the whole very little international malfeasance. Americans are optimistic people.
  • latchkey 4y ago
    > Americans are optimistic people. My optimism died the second time Bush Jr. was elected, but I'm only 49.
    • z3c0 4y ago
      I think the political group being spoken of here would've been the crowd reinvigorated by his election.
      • latchkey 4y ago
        Mission accomplished
• fundad 4y ago
  Military and police are America’s most popular social programs, have the most powerful constituencies and their budgets grow constantly.
• xeromal 4y ago
  In the US, the military is actually used for combat operations so the risk of being injured or killed is higher than being "a shop owner, or carpenter or doctor or whatever". The majority aren't but you're still signing up for it when you join so you are given an amount of elevated respect. It's not something you sign up for willie nillie. You're obligated to serve for at least a tour (4 years I believe) and in those 4 years, you've lost every bit of free-will. It's a sacrifice that I wasn't willing to make so kudos to those who do.
  • neoromantique 4y ago
    As almost everywhere in the world. Enrolling into military is a choice and you know risks beforehand, there’s nothing about that choice that deserves worship-like cult status military has in US.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    • sicp-enjoyer 4y ago
      And why do you think they take those risks? Do you think they would if people treated it like a job at mcdonalds? Would their families support them in being away for so long for 30k/year?
      • quesera 4y ago
        Some of them absolutely would, yes. But psychologically, the drive to be a part of something important is very strong, especially in young men. The military has a rich mythology that plays into, and perpetuates, this. This is not bad or unhealthy! But it is also not inherently good. There are other groups which use the same tactics to recruit people for bad services. It very very much depends.
        • sicp-enjoyer 4y ago
          I completely agree, but I think that "rich mythology" you refer to is fueled by the public also believing in it to a great extent.
• sicp-enjoyer 4y ago
  Consider the following: 1. Although military people are paid, it's not enough to compensate the amount of time, health risks, and loss of normal rights and freedoms experienced by young people. 2. Are we better off or worse off if people think of service as just a job to pay the bills? I'm not naiive about this, but we want people to take it seriously, not treat it like a retail job at the mall. 3. A small number will ultimately die. I think you would be a foolish leader/government to give those people who died for you anything but respect if you hope for similar sacrifice in the future.