4 ms·
Can't really "fix it in post" when its live broadcast TV, which is what the linked YouTube video is talking about.
by kayfox 4y ago
Can't really "fix it in post" when its live broadcast TV, which is what the linked YouTube video is talking about.
- dehrmann 4y agoGive AI 5 years.
- bigiain 4y agoYep, “so cheap they’re practically disposable” GoPro and similar cameras have made whole new categories of video possible (seemingly mostly Redbull promos…) But there’s a huge difference between a YouTuber with 7 GoPros strapped to their car/bike/wingsuit, and the on board cameras used for real time broadcasting for F1/MotoGP/NASCAR. I’d bet there’s about three orders of magnitude more money involved in getting the cockpit shot from Lewis Hamiltons car into a live race broadcast compared to even “big budget” YouTube “fix it in post” production houses like Hoonigan.
- LiquidPolymer 4y ago100% correct about live broadcast. “Fix it in post” is not viable and shouldn’t be relied upon generally. My larger point was really about the distinguishing characteristics between “pro” and ”prosumer” are diminishing rapidly. When a minor correction in edit is all that stands between $50,000 in expense the incentives are easy to figure.
- rcme 4y agoIn the case of this video, though, there is a massive difference between pro and prosumer. The pro lens needs a massive focal length, massive aperture, and precise motor controls. There is no prosumer alternative and the lens really is worth 200K based on what it’s able to do.
- ekianjo 4y agothe threshold for fixing in post in real time is decreasing every year though.
- Aeolun 4y agoIf it’s chromatic abberation from a specific camera there is no reason (aside from processing power) why you couldn’t fix that live right?