3 ms·
It's not strange _at_all_ to present all aspects of an unknown in a good faith effort to determine the truth. That being said, it's not surprising you decide so
by Supermancho 4y ago
It's not strange _at_all_ to present all aspects of an unknown in a good faith effort to determine the truth. That being said, it's not surprising you decide something is settled only based on things you agree with.
- tptacek 4y agoWe are definitely the only two people reading this, and you're likely to have the last word because it's not going to occur to me to go back and reread a 2-week-old thread, but if you'd like to rebut anything I say in the future, I recommend presenting evidence that contradicts my argument rather than evidence that supports it. Your problem isn't that I refuse to read things I disagree with; it's that you didn't find anything for me to disagree with.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Supermancho 4y agoSo far you have dismissed some studies as poisoned by contradictory interest and characterized some studies as supporting. I claim undecided. You claim "broad consensus", for some value of broad that you have curated from sources...at least nothing beyond what I've cited. I don't think anything has changed. GL