3 ms·
That's why I'm making a distinction here. It's not that the interface is inherently bad, but simply that we lack the knowledge/ability to implement it well. Th
by AlotOfReading 4y ago
That's why I'm making a distinction here. It's not that the interface is inherently bad, but simply that we lack the knowledge/ability to implement it well.
The follow-up question is whether we need a fully human-level ai or if we can design systems so that we naturally engage with them in such a way that the limitations aren't significant issues. I could certainly make an argument against that , but I've been wrong enough times about the practical capabilities of ML systems to suspect that my imagination is simply a bit limited in this area.
- marcosdumay 4y ago> or if we can design systems so that we naturally engage with them in such a way that the limitations aren't significant issues. Fair enough. I can imagine that happening. It wouldn't be the first unreasonably easy problem we get in AI.