3 ms·
>Because it creates too much friction at the point of transfer. The definition of the desired process outcome is "it is demonstrable that the asset was transfe
by NovemberWhiskey 4y ago
>Because it creates too much friction at the point of transfer.
The definition of the desired process outcome is "it is demonstrable that the asset was transferred willingly". What is your idea of "less friction at the point of transfer" that achieves that goal? Otherwise, we're back to "this is indistinguishable from theft".
- widowlark 4y agoWho is the authority that determines that "it is demonstrable that the asset was transferred willingly"?
- fnordpiglet 4y agoReceipts from Best Buy
- trinsic2 4y agoNo, its Apple inserting themselves into the process. The same process apple uses to deny independent computer repair centers access to parts. This isn't about preventing theft. Its about apple controlling how hardware is accessed and used and you can see that be how the treat their customers and repair centers.
- NovemberWhiskey 4y ago>No, its Apple inserting themselves into the process. How exactly do you think this works, without a trusted third party?
- trinsic2 4y agoBy trusted 3d party do you mean Apple? The same company profiting of off making hardware less accessible, forcing people to by new devices instead of being able to repair there own stuff. You mean that trusted 3d party?