3 ms·
> Why would you need to challenge that? That's precisely the question, yes. > Are you implying something that's more than one in a million? Court cases aren'
by msla 4y ago
> Why would you need to challenge that?
That's precisely the question, yes.
> Are you implying something that's more than one in a million?
Court cases aren't about the common occurrences.
- Dylan16807 4y ago> That's precisely the question, yes. Don't be vague on purpose. Say what you're implying. > Court cases aren't about the common occurrences. Usually they still are. But I'm talking about things being very rare among court cases. Do you think there is a systemic problem of false court transcripts? And I really don't think such a thing is the reason not to allow recording.
- msla 4y agoWe do certain things to avoid the image of impropriety. We also look askance at people who refuse to allow oversight into their work.
- Dylan16807 4y agoThat oversight is a big part of why the court reporter exists, and has existed since long before recording technology was invented. Keeping things the same is not a refusal of oversight.
- raydiatian 4y agoThe civil exception handler. “I’ll see you in catch!”