3 ms·
>in 01997 it was acceptable to them >c++ projects today are very different from c++ projects in the 01990s >a lot of c++ projects in the 01990s You got the yea
by midoridensha 4y ago
>in 01997 it was acceptable to them
>c++ projects today are very different from c++ projects in the 01990s
>a lot of c++ projects in the 01990s
You got the year wrong with that '0' prefix. The decade you're referring to is the 11990s.
- shadowofneptune 4y agoThis might be the finest criticism I've seen of attempts to extend the Christian epoch forward or backwards.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- midoridensha 4y agoFor those that don't know, my comment is based on the Holocene Era calendar, aka Human era calendar (HE). Basically, human civilization started roughly 12k years ago, in ~-10000BCE. The HE calendar lets us express all human-era events using positive numbers, and does so in a way that just tacks a '1' onto the popular Gregorian calendar so it's very easy to convert.
- Dylan16807 4y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar https://longnow.org/ideas/long-now-years-five-digit-dates-and-10k-compliance-at-home/ https://longnow.org/ideas/long-now-years-five-digit-dates-an... Good luck getting people to agree on anything.
- pavlov 4y agoMaybe we could start the epoch from when Homo erectus invented fire two million years ago and align with the Christian era for convenience. So this is now the year 2,002,023 FE (Fire Era).