4 ms·
Lichess.org does everything Chess.com does but more, without needing to pay.
by TurkishPoptart 4y ago
Lichess.org does everything Chess.com does but more, without needing to pay.
- cosentiyes 4y agolichess.org >>> chess.com. I encourage everyone who can afford to donate to do so!
- sebastiansm 4y agoFeature wise I agree with you, lichess is amazing. Chess.com funds a lot of tounaments that make the chess scene a lot more fun and interesting, lichess cant't do that.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- cosentiyes 4y agothey could if everyone donates!
- calderknight 4y agoAnd it respects your freedom
- _Algernon_ 4y agoWhere can I get my soul crushed by Mittens on Lichess?
- pythonlover2153 4y agoPlay a game against Stockfish level 8
- urbandw311er 4y agoI don’t mind paying for something particularly if it means the people who run it can make a living from it —- and hopefully ensure it’s still around in 10 years time.
- rom-antics 4y agoSame here, that's why I pay for Lichess! https://lichess.org/patron https://lichess.org/patron
- urbandw311er 4y agoMy comment was in reference to the post implying people should move to free Lichess rather than paying chess.com
- linkdd 4y agoLichess has less chess variants, less learning content (made by IMs and GMs), and has some gameplay differences: - on chess.com you can premove multiple times, each premove consume 0.1s on the clock - on lichess, you can premove only one time, but it does not consume time on the clock Also the player pool being different, the rankings are not equivalent, and chess.com's player pool is bigger. Also, from personal experience (so this is only anecdotal), the most toxic players (insulting in the chat, or ragequitting, ...) I met were on lichess. Comments of the form "X is better than Y" are subjective and do not add any value/information to the discussion.
- gardenhedge 4y agoI've used both and would rather be a free user of Chess.com than Lichess.org.