5 ms·
But that's because the movie is still recognisable. Using an algorithm doesn't automatically remove copyright, but if the algorithm transforms the data to a poi
by yosame 4y ago
But that's because the movie is still recognisable. Using an algorithm doesn't automatically remove copyright, but if the algorithm transforms the data to a point where it can't be recognised as the original work, then it isn't breaking copyright.
- Groxx 4y agoThose may be fine, yes. But the AI as a whole is capable of reproducing the original in a recognizable form, and it does so on demand quite easily, because it was trained on them - how is it different than selling a zip file containing millions of copyrighted works, and also a bunch of new stuff?
- chii 4y ago> how is it different than selling a zip file containing millions of copyrighted works so you're saying that the digits of pi is violating copyright then?
- Groxx 4y agoI can ask one to produce copyrighted works. The other, not so much. That's a rather weak straw-man.
- kube-system 4y agoCopyright law hinges on human element of the actions taking place, not on mathematical technicality. The digits of pi are not creative human expression, nor are they derived from human expression, they're a factual mathematical discovery. They can neither infringe on copyright, nor are they subject to it themselves.
- chii 4y agoSo what differentiates the matrix of numbers in the AI model, vs digits of pi?