4 ms·
You are just anthropomorphizing the model by calling it teaching and then implicitly equating that it's the same thing happening in the human mind. That's your
by freejazz 4y ago
You are just anthropomorphizing the model by calling it teaching and then implicitly equating that it's the same thing happening in the human mind. That's your burden to establish when you say it's the same.
- unusualmonkey 4y agoActually, isn't the burden of the plaintiffs to prove their copyrights are being violated? Whether or not it's identical to human brains isn't the matter, they'd need to prove how a small 5GB model trained from a huge dataset infringes their rights specifically.
- freejazz 4y agoWell if it's their defense they need to substantiate it. Obviously the plaintiff has a theory, they filed the case.
- usrbinbash 4y agoI am not anthropomorphizing anything, because this is literally what happens. The model is taught, by having its predictions tested against examples, how images work.
- freejazz 4y agoYou are, that's not what teaching means and it's not what learning means.
- usrbinbash 4y agoOkay, then what do these 2 terms mean?