3 ms·
How did they train the AI without first storing the data? It's not in the model, but it was used without permission in the pipeline that lead to creating that
by Winsaucerer 4y ago
How did they train the AI without first storing the data? It's not in the model, but it was used without permission in the pipeline that lead to creating that AI model.
I don't know if that counts as plagiarism, but there's clearly some use of this copyright material that the authors probably didn't envision and did not grant permission for. I have no idea what the law would be in cases like this
- chii 4y ago> How did they train the AI without first storing the data? the data was originally permitted to be copied. The question isn't whether the training is violating copyright - as long as the data set had permission to be viewed (which it must have, since it was public). The question is whether the final result - the model/weights - is a derivative work of the training data set. If it is a derivative work, then the model must be in violation of copyright. But copyright law allows for sufficiently transformative work to be considered new, rather than derivative. So is training a model using methods like this constitute a transformative work?