2 ms·
The anthropomorphisation of the ML baffles me. This is not AI but a large ML model trained on often proprietary data. The whole discussion is ridiculous. There
by kmac_ 4y ago
The anthropomorphisation of the ML baffles me. This is not AI but a large ML model trained on often proprietary data. The whole discussion is ridiculous. There should be a lineage of model data so we should know what's the original source (at least for the "core" of the answer) in form of citations. I assume that the model loose that information during the training and that would be quite hard as everything is mixed together.
- danielbln 4y agoIs it really that baffeling? Take ChatGPT, a model specifically fine tuned on dialog interactions to seem more human like. Of course people are going to anthropomorphise it. And the whole thing about it not being AI but an ML model, I think we can let that one go. It didn't stop the term cloud computing ("it's just someone else's server") and it won't stop the term AI from being used for this tech.
- freejazz 4y agoIt's baffling because it's being done by people who would otherwise insist on technical correctness and rebut any argument otherwise with "well, how do humans think?"