4 ms·

AI is not human children.

• adrianN 4y ago
  I can instruct an AI to draw Mickey Mouse and infringe copyright and I can instruct a child to draw Mickey Mouse and infringe copyright.
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  • mattwad 4y ago
    The problem is there's no way a user will know whose copyright they are infringing when they ask AI to "paint a landscape." Maybe the AI needs to be able to print out a list of sources to provide attribution. That would be interesting.
    • est31 4y ago
      Artists get inspired by others all the time, and if the results are far enough from each other, then nobody has a problem with that. In fact, pre copyright, the similarities used to be even larger. Art lives from the concept of taking ideas, and improving on them.
    • chii 4y ago
      > they ask AI to "paint a landscape." that's the responsibility of the user said AI to check.
  • threeseed 4y ago
    And when you try and sell that work without attribution or compensation then there is a problem.
    • oneeyedpigeon 4y ago
      Exactly. If I produce a work, and then you produce an identical-enough work, you're infringing my copyright. I don't care how you did it, it makes absolutely no difference to me.