4 ms·
I don't know, I'm pretty happy with Pipenv. It's the standard among the people I talk to and very good at being "pip, but better". I've tried poetry but don't r
by solarkraft 4y ago
I don't know, I'm pretty happy with Pipenv. It's the standard among the people I talk to and very good at being "pip, but better". I've tried poetry but don't really find it good enough to justify being so different, maybe unless you already have a pyproject.toml anyway.
There's a lot of talk about Python packaging but as a semi-casual user I've actually had very few problems with it.
- PrivateButts 4y agoPipenv left a bitter taste in many mouths, but honestly for the last two years it's been fine. What I want is for the Pipfile to get merged into the pyproject.toml at this point, so that we can speed up the move to pyproject.toml for everything.
- Hackbraten 4y agoFormer heavy Pipenv user here. Moved all my projects to Poetry for reasons. But in hindsight, I must say that Pipenv used to work just fine for me, as does Poetry today. No major issues so far with either tool. What I do miss is being able to `pipenv run myscript`. That UX has degraded slightly for me, having to say `poetry run poe myscript` now. Barely an inconvenience though.