3 ms·
It's not really about the cost though, is it? If they were donating to the KKK or literally setting cash on fire, I doubt you'd have the same outlook. Wasted or
by jimbob45 4y ago
It's not really about the cost though, is it? If they were donating to the KKK or literally setting cash on fire, I doubt you'd have the same outlook. Wasted or misspent money is never something to overlook, particularly when you could have justified keeping a few more employees on if you'd just stopped setting money on fire.
- pjc50 4y agoWatch out for the PACs. https://www.protocol.com/tech-company-pacs-2019-2020 https://www.protocol.com/tech-company-pacs-2019-2020 (somewhere between donating to the KKK, setting it on fire, and using it for bribes). I wonder what a company that donates equally to both sides is trying to achieve, hmm?
- jimbob45 4y agoI don't know if you're American or not but that's a common strategy to select higher quality candidates for your side whilst selecting the lowest possible quality candidate for the opposing side via the primary process. That said, that's not always the case and you could absolutely be right.
- minsc_and_boo 4y agoCompanies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians. Falsely equivocating spending on diversity programs to "donating to the KKK or literally setting cash on fire" is really telling. This monthly discussion comes up on HN and it's already turning into a dumpster fire.
- it_citizen 4y ago> Companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians. I hope this is right. But I keep seeing stats like that being thrown around and implying that the cause of those high financial returns are diversity when it is as likely that projections of high financial returns give you the money and time to focus more heavily on diversity. Both can also be symptoms of a common cause such as healthier management. Again, correlation is not causation.
- edgyquant 4y agoThis is surely the case. It gets old watching progressives paint their interpretations as objective fact.
- minsc_and_boo 4y agoCould you share some of these stats being thrown around that you're eluding to?
- dmitrygr 4y ago> Companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35 percent more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians. Falsely equivocating correlation and causation is really telling.
- rdslw 4y agoSo true. SJW at its finest :-(
- minsc_and_boo 4y agoAnd yet, somehow, there is zero correlation between hiring KKK members and organizational competitive success - hence the false equivocation. Nobody said anything about causation, you raised that straw man yourself. If you'd look up the stat I quoted, you'd see McKinsey says the same thing: >While correlation does not equal causation (greater gender and ethnic diversity in corporate leadership doesn’t automatically translate into more profit), the correlation does indicate that when companies commit themselves to diverse leadership, they are more successful. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/why-diversity-matters https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizatio...
- edgyquant 4y agoRight but it is instead likely the case that companies with ridiculous profitability are likely to have diversity programs. That’s the thing about statements like this, it’s just one interpretation of the data.
- telotortium 4y ago> top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity This is the rare case where BIPOC is actually a useful concept. Is this still true when counting only BIPOCS (no Asians, no Hispanics, etc.)?
- babelfish 4y agoHow can you equate spending on diversity with spending on the KKK?