4 ms·
> They don't need to fire anyone. They just want to. Why would they want to? If they make so much money, why fire a few people for a massive amount of bad PR?
by W4ldi 4y ago
> They don't need to fire anyone. They just want to.
Why would they want to?
If they make so much money, why fire a few people for a massive amount of bad PR?
So seem to know the reasoning. Enlighten us please.
- IshKebab 4y agoBecause Google employees are really really expensive, and this won't generate a massive amount of bad PR because everyone is doing it. It's the ideal time to sack of employees you don't want.
- pm90 4y agoIts not bad PR when the narrative has already been set. This is a very opportunistic move at cost reduction that would have been scrutinized heavily under regular circumstances.
- oblio 4y agoEveryone's doing it, we might be in a recession, now is the best time. Their announcement both follows a trend and gets lost in the noise, it doesn't stand out as possibly bad management. Plus someone was saying that it reduces inflationary pressures for employees. I.e. you put a lot of people out on the job market and you scare others inside the company, who are now suddenly happy to still have a job, ergo they stop asking as much for raises or for high salaries when they apply. > Why would they want to? Then enlighten me how a <<hugely>> profitable business needs to <<layoff>> large percentages of its workforce???