3 ms·

I see Getty's point of view considering if images were used for training towards a commercial end then there could be a case. But it really is an interesting qu

I see Getty's point of view considering if images were used for training towards a commercial end then there could be a case. But it really is an interesting question about if the training model is "legally" considered inspiration. Still a strange question for me but will be very interesting to see the results of this. It was always going to happen eventually.

freejazz 4y ago
It cannot be legally considered "inspiration": "1. the process of being mentally stimulated to do or feel something, especially to do something creative." Stable Diffusion does not have a mental process.