> This can destroy the potential creativity that was possible from the replaced humans within that specific trade. You could argue the same from any introducti

> This can destroy the potential creativity that was possible from the replaced humans within that specific trade. You could argue the same from any introduction of technology that replaces humans. If the output of the machine is of sufficient quality to replace humans, then they should be replaced. If the fear is that those displaced humans will no longer be useful, then society will need to subsidize their existence, or find a way to make use of those displaced humans (such as retraining). It is an unrelated problem to copyright, and copyright should not be used to ensure some group of humans do not get displaced. > only copies or amalgamations of existing works. Not that i agree with the premise of machines lacking creativity, but many of today's human created content is of such level as well.