> And the FTC is not banning unenforceable non-competes, the proposed rule bans all non-competes. Conditional (the condition of every single one going to court

> And the FTC is not banning unenforceable non-competes, the proposed rule bans all non-competes. Conditional (the condition of every single one going to court) versus unconditional. I see no reason the power to ban would be limited to a specific interpretation, in this case. What is the argument (not just reiterating the point of contention)?