3 ms·
I’m skeptical. The problem with grains and hydroponics is that grains are just so cheap it doesn’t make economic sense to do it. Vegetables, particularly leafy
by jonathankoren 4y ago
I’m skeptical. The problem with grains and hydroponics is that grains are just so cheap it doesn’t make economic sense to do it. Vegetables, particularly leafy greens, are mostly water and can be sold at tremendous markup. I don’t see anything here that changes that economic reality. Even if they were able to double wheat production to 4 crops a year, I don’t that’s enough to make it viable.
Most telling is this passage:
>It’s a tradeoff, says Frederick Smith, a regenerative food consultant. “You replace field-based risk with cost-based risk,” he says. “Having control of [variables such as water and temperature] eliminates a lot of potential risks, and that really appeals to investors who don’t understand farming as much and are looking to invest in something at scale.”
This makes it sound like that investors that understand they market and biology, are staying away, and instead meme investors are who they’re trying to attract.
That ain’t good.
- lightedman 4y ago"The problem with grains and hydroponics is that grains are just so cheap it doesn’t make economic sense to do it." It makes a ton of economic and ecological sense if you actually break it down. Damn shame the article fails to do so. We knew it made sense a decade ago when I got brought into the field to improve upon the lighting aspects for several companies.
- imtringued 4y agoThose companies aren't exactly profitable today.
- jonathankoren 4y agoNo dude. It does not make economic sense to grow cereal grains. This has been studied multiple times. It costs $20 to grow enough wheat for a single loaf of bread. https://thehydroponicsplanet.com/can-cereals-be-grown-hydroponically/ https://thehydroponicsplanet.com/can-cereals-be-grown-hydrop...