5 ms·

Why do we keep posting the same arguments over and over with these stories. It's like how humans learn. It contains chunks of copywriter material. What about c

Why do we keep posting the same arguments over and over with these stories. It's like how humans learn. It contains chunks of copywriter material. What about copilot. Hackers don't respect artists. Yadda yadda. It's boring. I don't know the answer, but after reading the same things over and over I don't know if I trust myself to even have a valid opinion about it.

mbgerring 4y ago
There’s a pretty easy answer here actually: if you want to include data in a set of training data for an AI system, you need to have (formal, statutory) permission to use it.
- chii 4y ago
  why should a new right (the right to study the works) be granted without some compensation given back to society? The existing set of rights granted under copyright does not include this.
  - visarga 4y ago
    Yes, copyright protects expression, not ideas. Ideas are protected with patents.
    - ghaff 4y ago
      It's implementations (supposedly) that are covered by patents. Ideas are not.
- dymk 4y ago
  No, you don’t
Popeyes 4y ago
Well at least going to court over this should clarify the legal rights of the artists and the position of AI. I can't see the artists winning.