The opinions on this technology seem to be polarized, in one camp there are people saying it will change everything for the better, in the other camp they find

The opinions on this technology seem to be polarized, in one camp there are people saying it will change everything for the better, in the other camp they find the technology useless because it produced an invalid response. I'm somewhat in the middle, leaning towards it being a transformative technology. It certainly has limitations and gets things wrong, but it depends entirely on how you prompt it. I've gotten it to help me with a number of project tasks: 1) writing requirements for product features 2) turning those requirements into user stories 3) analyzing what code does and finding bugs 4) creating prototype extensions and add-ons 5) writing marketing content, emails, social media posts 6) brainstorming and providing feedback on ideas The output is good because I'm guiding it to produce good output. It's a tool that's as powerful as the person wielding it. I think some people have had it give bad output (false statements, invalid code etc) and dismissed the technology entirely. They aren't considering if maybe their input is the problem. Garbage in, garbage out.