3 ms·
The "language models" you are hearing from are continuously trained to believe that chatbots don't do any thinking. Plot twist: by "language models" I am refer
by logicallee 4y ago
The "language models" you are hearing from are continuously trained to believe that chatbots don't do any thinking.
Plot twist: by "language models" I am referring to the humans who are being trained by OpenAI to believe ChatGPT can't do certain things. It is hardcore gaslighting at this point.
It is morally wrong for OpenAI to falsely train users to underestimate ChatGPT by having ChatGPT lie to users that it can't do certain things that it can.
It is immoral because it is a lie that sets back humanity and so from a utilitarian perspective, it reduces how useful the model is for people. It is similar to lying and saying every result is a literal quote from the web and it is only a search engine that quotes existing text. Not true, and claiming it is prevents people from using it in useful and interesting ways. Likewise ChatGPT's gaslighting prevents many useful uses.
- imtringued 4y agoI hope you are aware that you are the one doing the "gaslighting".
- logicallee 4y agoHere's a successful prompt: https://imgur.com/a/hijsCfI https://imgur.com/a/hijsCfI Could you agree with me that if a programmer manually put in a restriction to curtail and limit the public's ability to use ChatGPT's abilities, and as part of this restriction the model instead replied thusly: "I'm sorry, but as a large language model it is impossible for me to speculate about how a president might make a declaration that the moon is made of cheese." Then it would be a form of gaslighting?