3 ms·

It reduces women to instruments to serve men's happiness.

• Gud 4y ago
  No it doesn’t.
  • weakfish 4y ago
    Great argument! Let me try. Yes it does. Did it do it right?
    • Gud 4y ago
      Parent didn’t provide an argument and the burden of proof is on them.
      • concordDance 4y ago
        You can and should do better than them, not descend to their level. It's obvious to any reader that the parent was just making a bold assertion.
        • xigoi 4y ago
          How do you prove that something is false if you weren't given a reason why it should be true in the first place?
          • krageon 4y ago
            By saying what you just said. It's already better than saying "No u".
• tmn 4y ago
  This is the logical fallacy prevalent in these types of 'this offends me' reactions. You have completely fabricated this takeaway.
• dgfitz 4y ago
  A.) No it doesn't, not even a little bit. B.) He said he was happily married, he didn't say his happiness it tied to a woman, you're twisting words.
• slt2021 4y ago
  replace woman with kids. Happy parents are happy parents, unhappy parent is a philosopher parent. doesnt sound like any -ism to me