3 ms·
>However, supporters of the amendment, including child protection charities, argue that only personal liability for company bosses will ensure the child safety
by tjpnz 4y ago
>However, supporters of the amendment, including child protection charities, argue that only personal liability for company bosses will ensure the child safety provisions are effective.
The idea of social media execs serving prison sentences appeals to me. How would this work in practice if Meta/Byte Dance relocated their UK based staff out of the country?
- rwmj 4y agoThis is very common actually, eg. laws around banking regulation or import/export. The laws require you to have "designated individuals" who have to be residents. For example here's a law related to handling human tissues in the UK: https://www.hta.gov.uk/guidance-professionals/licences-roles-and-fees/licensing/designated-individuals-and-licence-holders https://www.hta.gov.uk/guidance-professionals/licences-roles... Here's another one to do with child safety: https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/research-resources/templates/nominated-child-protection-lead-role https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/research-resources/templates/n...
- klooney 4y agoHostage laws!