5 ms·

I would never want that though. It should change lanes and pass.

by alar44 4y ago

code_runner 4y ago
It can if they want it to. It’s a car.
MBCook 4y ago
It’s very useful on long drives since you don’t have to constantly adjust your speed by little bits (manually or adjusting the cruise control setting). Takes a moment to moment mental load off so you can focus on the other cars around you better. If the cars ahead of me are slowing down significantly I disengage and go manual until I have a better idea what’s going on. My car can supposedly stop completely that way. I’ve never tried that, as it gets very slow (relative to highway) it’s willing to get way closer to the vehicle in front me than I am. I trust it (in theory). But it’s not worth testing.
- komali2 4y ago
  I wonder why this is preferable to just taking the train for longer trips? Wouldn't it be nicer to sit back and let someone else do all the driving for however many hundred of you are all going to the same place anyway? Once you get past the long part of the trip you could always rent a car if it's rural or whatever.
  - Rebelgecko 4y ago
    Kind of derailing things, but train usefulness varies on area. At least where I live, train journeys are usually more expensive and significantly slower than a comparable flight (maybe similar speed to driving but still more expensive). And for a lot rural areas it's not a viable option
  - MBCook 4y ago
    ACC is nice on freeways around town if traffic isn’t heavy (I like more control when it is). Long distances is where it really shines. Really the train isn’t viable in most of the US. And then you have no car at the end, probably in a city with bad public transit unless you want to take taxis/Ubers or have friends/family drive you around. So for long hauls, it tends to be a car or a plane. And that decision is heavily influenced by distance.
  - eric_the_read 4y ago
    The only train I could find that goes anywhere near my mother's house would take approximately 12 hours, with a 5 hour layover in a small town with ~nothing to do. I can drive it in maybe 1.5 hours. That's why.
    - komali2 4y ago
      Is this considered an acceptable situation to you and your community? What does your government representative say when you demand better public transit solutions?
  - toast0 4y ago
    The train would be nice if it was a reasonable alternative, but in the US outside of very specific trips, it's usually at least twice the travel time as a car, door to door, with two drivers and maybe 10-12 hours of daily driving. And then you've still got to manage ground transportation from wherever the train station is to wherever you want to go. It's great if you're a container though.

I would never want that though. It should change lanes and pass.

by alar44 4y ago

I would never want that though. It should change lanes and pass.

code_runner 4y ago

It can if they want it to. It’s a car.

MBCook 4y ago

It’s very useful on long drives since you don’t have to constantly adjust your speed by little bits (manually or adjusting the cruise control setting). Takes a moment to moment mental load off so you can focus on the other cars around you better. If the cars ahead of me are slowing down significantly I disengage and go manual until I have a better idea what’s going on. My car can supposedly stop completely that way. I’ve never tried that, as it gets very slow (relative to highway) it’s willing to get way closer to the vehicle in front me than I am. I trust it (in theory). But it’s not worth testing.

komali2 4y ago
I wonder why this is preferable to just taking the train for longer trips? Wouldn't it be nicer to sit back and let someone else do all the driving for however many hundred of you are all going to the same place anyway? Once you get past the long part of the trip you could always rent a car if it's rural or whatever.
- Rebelgecko 4y ago
  Kind of derailing things, but train usefulness varies on area. At least where I live, train journeys are usually more expensive and significantly slower than a comparable flight (maybe similar speed to driving but still more expensive). And for a lot rural areas it's not a viable option
- MBCook 4y ago
  ACC is nice on freeways around town if traffic isn’t heavy (I like more control when it is). Long distances is where it really shines. Really the train isn’t viable in most of the US. And then you have no car at the end, probably in a city with bad public transit unless you want to take taxis/Ubers or have friends/family drive you around. So for long hauls, it tends to be a car or a plane. And that decision is heavily influenced by distance.
- eric_the_read 4y ago
  The only train I could find that goes anywhere near my mother's house would take approximately 12 hours, with a 5 hour layover in a small town with ~nothing to do. I can drive it in maybe 1.5 hours. That's why.
  - komali2 4y ago
    Is this considered an acceptable situation to you and your community? What does your government representative say when you demand better public transit solutions?
- toast0 4y ago
  The train would be nice if it was a reasonable alternative, but in the US outside of very specific trips, it's usually at least twice the travel time as a car, door to door, with two drivers and maybe 10-12 hours of daily driving. And then you've still got to manage ground transportation from wherever the train station is to wherever you want to go. It's great if you're a container though.