Ironically this reads as cherry picking. The author's criteria is explicit > only touching on those sources that have to do with asthma and gas stoves The ti

Ironically this reads as cherry picking. The author's criteria is explicit > only touching on those sources that have to do with asthma and gas stoves The tie in to climate happens at the end of the article -- where the authors have a conflict of interest (involvement with organizations seeking zero carbon buildings) and regulators near-immediately use this as a reason to move towards banning gas stoves for consumer safety. Which is absurd -- if the causal relationship between gas ranges and asthma were around 11% this would be apparent. The activism in this case is not about asthma, it's about weaponizing asthma.