3 ms·
We must replace lawyers with AI so we can battle corporations in the courts, cheaply and at scale.
by xwdv 4y ago
We must replace lawyers with AI so we can battle corporations in the courts, cheaply and at scale.
- inetknght 4y agoSomehow I don't think that will go as well as you hope it would.
- eternalban 4y agoDoes raise the bar. Legislation can set minimum FLOPS for public defenders.
- tehjoker 4y agoI can assure you that the minimum will be set reasonably at first and then be exceeded within a year. Then corporate influence will prevent it from being raised on a reasonable schedule, just like with minimum wage.
- eternalban 4y agoI sometimes omit the /s. I said the state will set the 'minimum' for public defenders, not 'maximum' for 'general AI attorney'.
- smegger001 4y agoI would prefer they legislate it have the same harware specs and access to the same training data as the prosecutor bot.
- wyldfire 4y agoIf we follow this incredible path over the coming century, all I can think of is the future doctor from "The Little Black Bag" [1]. Physician's tools become so advanced as to lower the bar for future doctors. Maybe future attorneys could rely more on AI to provide insight into relevant existing and potential novel case law. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Little_Black_Bag https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Little_Black_Bag
- beepbooptheory 4y agoWho owns the AI you would use if not some corporation?
- 0xcde4c3db 4y agoWhat are they going to do if I allegedly violated the license terms on their model? Sue me?
- hungryforcodes 4y agoWhat's interesting about this is once you can an AI that is a legal representative-- you can just spin up thousands or millions of them and start suing people for everything. Like legal spamming...
- triceratops 4y agoWouldn't the corporations have their own AI lawyers to defend? And they can pay for compute more easily than you.