6 ms·
Yes but we can only speculate what happened. My speculation: most of the power went through the light and only a part of it shocked the OP.
by _nalply 4y ago
Yes but we can only speculate what happened.
My speculation: most of the power went through the light and only a part of it shocked the OP.
- falcolas 4y agoI'd agree, and not being connected to a good ground helped.
- kragen 4y agothis is nonsense, and potentially deadly nonsense at that
- Dylan16807 4y agoI'm sorry what? You think it's nonsense that the lit lightbulb had more power going through it than the person touching the socket?
- kragen 4y agosurely the light was dissipating more power, yes, but this was offered as a potential explanation for the fact that the person getting shocked only got a mild shock, a fact to which it has no causal connection whatsoever
- Dylan16807 4y agoIt's not an explanation but it's directly connected to the explanation. Calling the whole thing nonsense, without elaboration, is confusing at best.
- kragen 4y agono, it's utter nonsense from someone who is confusing power with current and has potentially fatal incorrect causal models about current
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]