9 ms·
Netflix has job with almost $1M listed salary range, to comply with new CA law
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ablatt89 4y agoGood for the engineer who is an expert in those audio and video testing and can get hired for the role. We should be thankful engineering has provided many folk who were previously poor, an opportunity to rise to the middle class simply by studying and being smart.
- tony_cannistra 4y agoYou're right but I think you're missing the point. Offering a range that broad in the job listing is just an effort to flaunt a law. That law was put into place to help the people you're talking about.
- CodeWriter23 4y agoIt’s not flaunting a law. It’s a typical built in Sacramento law written by dilettantes who can’t think through the simplest of problems. Just like the “can’t charge extra for using a credit card” law. Prices went up and gas stations give a cash discount.
- butlerm 4y ago"Can't charge extra for using a credit card" is a contractual condition imposed by the credit card companies. If anything there should be a law voiding such conditions as contrary to sound public policy. Why should cash or debit card users in a competitive market be charged extra to subsidize rewards for credit card users, for example?
- rrrrrrrrrrrryan 4y agoWell, there is a law that states you can't charge extra for using a certain credit card. If you want to charge for credit card payments, the same fee has to apply to all cards you accept.
- CodeWriter23 4y agoBuilt in Sacramento https://oag.ca.gov/consumers/general/credit-card-surcharges https://oag.ca.gov/consumers/general/credit-card-surcharges
- butlerm 4y agoIt is always convenient for businesses to have the legislature enforce their preferred contract conditions in statutory law, but this particular statute sounds like it is unenforceable.
- chrismcb 4y agoBecause they don't. Handling cash is expensive, and typically costs more than credit card fees.
- tony_cannistra 4y agoYes it is. Perhaps Netflix is not _breaking_ a law, which itself may have been written by "dilettantes", but this action certainly disabuses us of the notion that Netflix has any intention to adhere to the spirit of the law, which was to reduce racial and gender-based salary gaps.
- Ferret7446 4y agoThe "spirit of the law" is to bend reality. Laws are always well intended but are often, to put it bluntly, stupid. If it were really that easy, we'd be living in paradise now. Just write another law! The only thing wrong with the current situation is, unfortunately, anyone naive enough to believe that this law was supposed to have the intended effect. Otherwise, it's functioning exactly as any sensible person would have predicted.
- maxerickson 4y agoIs it flouting a law though? The credit card thing mostly isn't a law, it's part of the merchant agreements. There's a few states with a "no fees" law (which all allow cash discounts): https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2021/04/05/its-illegal-to-charge-credit-card-processing-fees-in-these-5-states/43512911/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2021/04...
- seanmcdirmid 4y agoWritten by the same people that gave us the “everything causes cancer” warnings?
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Written by the same people that gave us the “everything causes cancer” warnings? No, Prop 65 was written by a lawyer for the Environmental Defense Fund and proposed and passed as an initiative measure, SB 1162 was written by Senator Monique Limon and adoptef by the State Legislature. Different people, different process.
- Ferret7446 4y agoI presume they meant people who share similar values and beliefs, not literally the same individuals. Specifically, the kind of liberal values associated with California, since the state is often mocked for said "cancer" warnings outside of the state (or other states with similar values).
- Fatnino 4y agoThe typical cash discount at any gas station in California that I've seen is 10 cents. I get 3% back on gas purchases from my credit card. Question: At what price per gallon does it stop making cents (heh) to buy with cash? Hint: California hasn't had gas at that price for many years already.
- butlerm 4y agoThe minimum salary paid for a position is useful information. The median or estimated median may be as well. Legislated disclosure of a maximum is useless. It implies that employees are interchangeable widgets with a cap on their market value that isn't more than some reasonable percentage of the minimum. There are true superstars out there that some companies can afford to compensate properly, but they are generally remarkably atypical and their salary is irrelevant to what a person of ordinary talent and experience can expect. I think it is great that some of them are worth and can be paid nearly $1M / year, but I wouldn't expect that to be relevant to the salary negotiation of most engineers taking a job with similar duties.
- Rebelgecko 4y ago>The minimum salary paid for a position is useful information Is it? I found SWE roles with a salary range from 50,000-50,000. But in reality I doubt there's any engineers at Netflix making 50k
- butlerm 4y agoMisrepresentation of salaries actually paid is false advertising. There was a time when stores would get in trouble for advertising discounts from prices no one actually paid either, like a permanent sale.
- dsfyu404ed 4y agoOr they're complying in good faith. They may very well be flexible and not really care if they hire a fresh out of school grad or a seasoned expert with a rockstar resume. They'll hire either and pay accordingly.
- tony_cannistra 4y agoMaybe, but I don't buy that a FAANG would hire a fresh-out-of-school grad at L5 with a $90k salary.
- dsfyu404ed 4y agoThe L5 thing is weird because the listed minimum qualifications would apply someone 4yr out of college (which doesn't usually correlate with L5) and the rest of the listing is very much worded in a way that is seniority-agnostic. Depending on how many of the requested qualifications (i.e. you come from a background that gives you little to no experience on most of them but a lot of depth on one specific ones) you hit 90k may be reasonable. This really just looks like a boilerplate job description with the bare minimum tweaks. Not surprising that the salary range wasn't tweaked.
- phailhaus 4y agoThere is likely no engineer at that level, instead they're gaming the law. They're required to report their salary range for transparency, and they're basically replying with "our salaries are between between 0 and $1M".
- remote_phone 4y agoI know a couple of Netflix employees making over 700k cash. I also have a friend who was a recruiter at Netflix that handled an offer to an engineer for $1M cash. These are real numbers.
- binarymax 4y agoThat’s fine but, there are probably multiple levels that have been glommed into one req…which makes it look not great. There should be jr, sr, principal, staff, etc.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- remote_phone 4y agoPreviously Netflix only had 2 levels: software engineer and senior software engineer. I heard they were going to change that but I don’t know to what extent that was changed.
- highwaylights 4y agoTell your friend I’m willing to slum it for $999k. Don’t expect more than 40 hours per week though. It’s not like you’re paying me the big bucks that Mike is getting. EDIT: On a serious note, I’d be all over this if they offered remote, but if they did they’d not offer nearly as much.
- tophi 4y agoCash? That seems inconvenient.
- deleted 4y ago
- the_shivers 4y agoIs there really nothing in the law preventing companies from doing things like this? Could they say something even more absurd like $1-$1,000,000?
- t-writescode 4y agoIn the law? No; but, this is the sort of thing that people who care about equality in pay should look at and refuse to work at. If there can be an 800k difference between two different employees with the same title that sit next to each other, that's not a place I would want to work for and wouldn't even apply.
- lovecg 4y agoI strongly suspect no place would pay 800k otherwise. The reality is these companies cannot simply have 800k positions with well defined criteria - these compensation levels are reserved for people that would be especially painful to replace, and the criteria are rarely cut and dry. You could come up with a bigger hammer to prevent these practices, but in the end the exceptional employees are the only ones to lose - I bet companies would love there to be a blanket ban on large compensation in the industry.
- t-writescode 4y ago> these compensation levels are reserved for people that would be especially painful to replace, and the criteria are rarely cut and dry. So they'd be more like the "fellow" position at other companies, then, yes? Or the senior staff engineers? The problem isn't the 900k, the problem is the 90-900k range. You can hide a lot of evil in a range that wide. You can hide gender and ethnic pay biases in that range. a 500-750k range for Principal engineers or 500k to 2MM range for "Senior Staff Engineers" makes more sense than 90k to 900k.
- jdminhbg 4y agoIf it's possible for there to be an $800k difference I am definitely applying.
- outside1234 4y ago$90000-$900000 seems like sort of a cop out on the spirit of the law
- raincom 4y agoThat's what lawyers are paid for. All tech companies in California can just pick this range $90K to $900K for every tech job. That way, one doesn't need to update the salary range field for every job.
- Retric 4y agoPresumably it’s not actually complying with the law. Try telling a Jude listing a salary range between minimum wage and 1 billion per year counts as salary disclosure. That said, this could easily become the norm should enough companies do the same thing.
- tylersmith 4y agoIt's unlikely a job is actually offering $1B, whereas many engineers get $1M+.
- Retric 4y agoIt’s equally unlikely the actual salary range is 90k to 900k for the same position. The issue isn’t 900k as a number or 90k as a number it’s the vast difference between them.
- tylersmith 4y agoPeople ask for and are worth vastly diffently amounts.
- Retric 4y agoIf they can expect to get and retain someone for 90k which can do the job then it’s hard to argue anyone is actually worth 10x as much. I am not saying nobody makes 900k, just that if they are willing to budget 900k they might be looking for more from an applicant than someone whose skills only commands 90k base salary.
- t-writescode 4y agoGiven what I'm seeing on levels.fyi for Netflix, they sound like exactly the sort of company that should be revealing their salaries more and that this law was made for (and of course they mock by offering such a ridiculous range). https://www.levels.fyi/companies/netflix/salaries/software-engineer https://www.levels.fyi/companies/netflix/salaries/software-e... In the samples, L5: 610k L3: 70k edit: formatting and this edit message
- endisneigh 4y agoUnsurprising. The ca law unfortunately isn’t robust enough. Standard deviation and inter quartile range is necessary in order to make any real assessment here. Ideally mean and median too.
- dymk 4y agoWhy? Let the market figure it out. If people don't like what Netflix is doing, then they won't apply for the job.
- justusw 4y agoIf this was anything but highly paid jobs in the tech industry, letting “the market figure it out” will not go well. Salary lower than minimum wage? No legal minimum parental leave granted? Hazardous work environment? Just quit and apply somewhere else!
- dragonwriter 4y ago> The ca law unfortunately isn’t robust enough Maybe, though Netflix just seems to just be blatantly violating the law, and the probably-unreasonable width of the range isn’t the most bright-line way. (Explicitly using total compensation instead of the mandatory salary or hourly wage is.)
- mightymikey 4y agoNetflix famously pays entirely base salary, letting employees take what percentage as options. In this case, they are reporting potential base because of their somewhat unique comp structure.
- Terretta 4y agoI thought the law is specifying base salary required, but not total comp. Meanwhile, Netflix offers flexibility in choosing base vs. equity rewards. So, while not required to, Netflix is providing the total comp guidance: "This market range is based on total compensation (vs. only base salary), which is in line with our compensation philosophy."
- TrackerFF 4y agoWould be nice to see the total comp salary distribution for this kind of position.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- tony_cannistra 4y agoColorado has a similar law, but I've never observed this kind of "range-hacking." Why would this happen in CA but not CO?
- t-writescode 4y agoAre we seeing this sort of insult in all CA companies? Or just Netflix so far? It could just be Netflix being harmful to its present and future employees.
- TheRealPomax 4y agoProbably because of selection bias: most of the huge tech companies are headquartered in CA, not CO, and of those, the ones that are just batshit insane when it comes to hiring are also found more in CA than in CO. And then because Netflix considered themselves a "dream team" snowflake, they even have a "we may decide to fire you if you're not the absolute best each week every week". But because of how they implement that, it really means "we'll fire you if you and your manager don't click". From https://jobs.netflix.com/culture https://jobs.netflix.com/culture: "To strengthen our dream team, our managers use a “keeper test” for each of their people: if a team member was leaving for a similar role at another company, would the manager try to keep them? Those who do not pass the keeper test (i.e. their manager would not fight to keep them) are given a generous severance package so we can find someone even better for that position—making an even better dream team. Being on a dream team is the thrill of a professional lifetime, and team members are incredibly supportive of each other. This is why "You make time to help colleagues across Netflix succeed" is a valued behavior." This is not a good company to work for, even if the people working there are amazing people to work with.
- t-writescode 4y agoMicrosoft? Amazon?
- highwaylights 4y agoI guess it depends on how well liked you are by your manager.
- the_mitsuhiko 4y agoLike every Austrian company every that quotes the CBA minimums on all job postings. Unless you are really running out of candidates there is no reason to post actual numbers.
- kjkjadksj 4y agoAren’t relevant salary ranges supposed to save HR and the applicants time in the job search process?
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> supposed to save HR and the applicants time in the job search process? Colorado has had this law for a while. Has this been studied?
- OJFord 4y ago> This market range is based on total compensation (vs. only base salary), Even if not the case here, isn't that to be expected then? Volatility in share price will put a big range in that figure for companies with less of the total comp in cash base salary.
- bri3d 4y agoThis isn't the case at Netflix, who famously offer cash salaries and an option to elect to forego some salary in exchange for options. There are no RSUs at Netflix. Also, RSU+cash salaries are almost universally quoted in year-of Total Direct Compensation, that is share value of the newly granted shares at the time they are granted each year, so volatility doesn't affect the TDC, only the actual realized TC.
- OJFord 4y agoIsn't a 'market range' not just Netflix? If not, (? and) it includes bonuses then, or something? Or else why call it out like that?
- subharmonicon 4y agoI wonder what follow-through the law has to fix/avoid this kind of behavior? I know some companies are now working to ensure that they no longer have a single listing for a job into which you could hire people at different levels, so that they can better honor the spirit of the law. It would be nice if the law itself ensured had a way to enforce or ensure that sort of behavior, but I don’t know what that would look like.
- tylersmith 4y agoAvoid what behavior? If that's the possible range of salaries they'll offer for the role then they're doing exactly what the law intends.
- andrewmutz 4y agoAgreed. Based on what I've heard from others at Netflix, it is plausible that some engineers are making $900K cash comp.
- mightymikey 4y agoNearly all staff engineer and above are making close to, if not above, 900k cash comp, based on levels.fyi
- sgustard 4y agoCertainly anyone applying for this job should ask "how do I qualify for the $900k salary band?" How is the interviewer going to answer that?
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> How is the interviewer going to answer that? “Why don’t you tell me?”
- tylersmith 4y agoYou don't check off list items to get into some predetermined upper band, you make them want to hire you even if they have to top out their budget for the role.
- dragonwriter 4y agoThis clearly does not comply with the law [0]. The listed range is based on total comp which it justifies with an appeal to Netflix’s “compensation philosophy”; the law, however, specifically defines the “pay scale” that must accompany a posting as being the “the salary or hourly wage range that the employer reasonably expects to pay for the position” [1], not total compensation, and the law does not include an exception for alternative compensation philosophy. [0] even ignoring the sizs of the range and the use of “reasonably expects” in the law, which I suspect, unless there are some very unusual factual circumstances applicable to the position, would also be problematic [1] Cal Labor Code 432.3(m)(1) as adopted in SB 1162 of 2022.
- andrewmutz 4y agoWhy do you think this is not cash comp? Friends at Netflix have told me employees get to choose the balance of cash/equity, and an employee can choose all cash.
- danielvf 4y agoNetflix is famous for its all cash compensation packages.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Netflix is famous for its all cash total compensation packages. Netflix uses “total compensation” to mean “total compensation excluding benefits”? Or Netflix has no (including those required by federal and state law for an employer of their size) benefits? (And it doesn’t, as it was previously reported to, have “free option” as part of its employee equity program that provides an amount equal to 5% of salary for stock option purchases, which would be very much a non-salary-or-hourly-wage part of total comp?)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- mightymikey 4y agoNetflix pays all base, with separate allowances for benefits. It lets employees choose what percentage of their base is granted as options. It's all very public: https://jobs.netflix.com/work-life-philosophy https://jobs.netflix.com/work-life-philosophy > Stock Option Program: Each employee chooses each year how much of their compensation they want in salary versus stock options. You can choose all cash, all options, or whatever combination suits you. You choose how much risk and upside (down) you want. These 10-year stock options are fully-vested and you keep them even if you leave Netflix.
- remote_phone 4y agoA lot of people responding on here don’t seem to understand that $900k/yr is a very real salary at Netflix. They pay top of the market and it’s all in cash. The pressure is very real and lots of people get fired quickly (a PM I worked with said she saw over 20 engineers let go in the 2 years she was there) but I find that the ones that stay at Netflix for a long time love it and are never worried about being fired.
- mightymikey 4y agowhy are they shooting themselves in the foot with a 90k minimum? looking at levels.fyi, 400-900 for a senior engineer would be way more enticing
- canonica 4y agoI'm shocked about their questions on their job application form! It's considered illegal to ask those questions in my country because they can be used for discrimination. Is this normal practice in the US? > What gender identity do you most closely identify with? > Are you a person of transgender experience? > Please select the race and/or ethnic identities you identify with > What sexual orientation do you most closely identify with? > Do you live with a disability (as outlined by the ADA)?
- random42_ 4y agoThese questions are optional, in my experience. I’ve never seen a form in a job application where these were required.
- canonica 4y agoIn my country it's absolutely illegal to ask, no matter if voluntary or involuntary.
- mightymikey 4y agoin the US, it is required top ask, but optional to fill
- idlephysicist 4y agoWhen I elected to not fill them in, HR told me that they would answer the questions for me. This was due to a "limitation of the system".
- ithkuil 4y agoI think the idea here is to use this information to "help" and "include" people, not to discriminate against them.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- 4y ago
- smugma 4y agoThis posting has a greater range ($330,000 - $1,800,000): https://jobs.netflix.com/jobs/253949563 https://jobs.netflix.com/jobs/253949563 As the range is based on total comp, it makes sense. If you are at the bottom of that range (which is likely just the base salary), you will probably be laid off (Netflix is transparent about this). It's still a massive range. I wonder how much of that total comp range is due to them estimating a certain amount of volatility (50%? 100%?) in their stock price.
- mightymikey 4y agoNetflix famously pays entirely base salary, letting employees take what percentage as options. In this case, they are reporting potential base because of their somewhat unique comp structure.
- nowherebeen 4y ago90k to 900k is the difference between living as lower class to upper middle class at Silicon Valley.
- mrmuagi 4y agoUpper middle class? Is multi-millionaire not "rich" anymore?
- nowherebeen 4y agoHigh cost of living city. A million doesn’t go as far as it used to (inflation). Think about how much real estate has increased in the last 10 years. That’s the biggest expense for anyone.
- ac29 4y agoSilicon Valley is expensive, but not so expensive that $900k/year is only middle class. That's $40k/month or so after taxes.
- Maro 4y agoTo me it feels like the range of $90k-900k is for all SWE IC levels, whereas the job post is specifically for L5. It cannot be that the range is so broad for a specific SWE level. By posting the overall range of SWE, the whole exercise becomes meaningless, because, of course interns earn (relatively) peanuts and the one "John Carmack guy" almost makes a million..
- mightymikey 4y agobased on levels.fyi for netflix, either netflix hires 50+ john carmacks, or it is a realistic sum for top performing L5s
- shagie 4y agoIf you poke at the L5 for Netflix, https://www.levels.fyi/companies/netflix/salaries/software-engineer/levels/l5 https://www.levels.fyi/companies/netflix/salaries/software-e... you will see that the range of compensation reported is $180k to $1.5M (an exception, the next cluster is at $900k). Putting a $90k to $900k on that application appears to be reasonable in that context.
- sn0w_crash 4y agoGood on Netflix. And good for the engineer who lands that role. Hard working Engineers- 1. California virtue signaling bureaucrats - 0.