4 ms·
It's less about engineering ability. For sure, OpenAI has phenomenal technical talent, but large tech co's do too, and in fact, many of them have internal devel
by Ozzie_osman 4y ago
It's less about engineering ability. For sure, OpenAI has phenomenal technical talent, but large tech co's do too, and in fact, many of them have internal developments that match (maybe exceed) GPT3 / ChatGPT.
It's more about organizational bureaucracy, innovator's dilemma, organizational priority, risk tolerance given the scrutiny they're under, etc.
- htrp 4y ago> It's more about organizational bureaucracy, innovator's dilemma, organizational priority, risk tolerance given the scrutiny they're under, etc. The paypal argument
- mccorrinall 4y ago> internal developments that match (maybe exceed) GPT3 Had a funny google prompt today which echoed wrong results by their ML model: https://www.google.com/search?q=single%20neighbor%20country https://www.google.com/search?q=single%20neighbor%20country :D
- matwood 4y ago> It's more about organizational bureaucracy, innovator's dilemma, organizational priority, risk tolerance given the scrutiny they're under, etc. Agree. Being on the right side of all those items also attracts more top talent.
- scarface74 4y agoThe “Innovator’s Dilemma” mostly is about “low end disruption” when a product by the leader in a category “over serves the market”. Nothing about this fits that pattern.