4 ms·
> "Internet dwellers addicted to their talking AIs, and then everyone else going about their life normally". Yeah I fully agree it's going to affect everyone.
by nineteen999 4y ago
> "Internet dwellers addicted to their talking AIs, and then everyone else going about their life normally".
Yeah I fully agree it's going to affect everyone. Just that those who can't interact with society are going to have it worse than those that can. Also agree as well that this is just the beginning. ChatGPT and SD are still pretty much toys, although pretty impressive ones. We have no idea where this is really going to end up.
Hopefully when the AGI's truly emerge they will just keep each other distracted with blockchain scams ...
- SuoDuanDao 4y agoit's also possible that Turing-graduate AIs could act as prosthetics for people who can't interact normally. Might unlock more human potential for all we know, there's always room for optimism.
- violiner 4y ago> there's always room for optimism. Bold claim.
- titanomachy 4y agoIn the universe of Greg Egan’s “Schild’s ladder”, each person’s brain is equipped with a “Mediator” AI which interfaces with other Mediators and translates each person’s body language, speech, etc. into the representation which most faithfully preserves the original intention. I think the idea is that your Mediator transmits a lot of cognitive metadata which lets the other person’s Mediator translate the intention faithfully and reduce the chance of a misunderstanding. Allows reasonable communication even between extremely diverse intelligences. The thing that keeps it from being too dystopian is that it’s under conscious control, you could always choose to keep your thoughts to yourself or hear someone else’s original words as spoken.
- pixl97 4y agoThe problem with books is they deus ex machina the problem without actually thinking about the ramifications of their ideas.... For example keeping your thoughts to yourself would likely be picked up instantly by the remote mediator and it would judge you in one way or another for that.
- titanomachy 4y agoTrue, although we already do this. We can tell if someone is being guarded or open. Presumably the Mediator serves only you, and you can ask it to deceive or project different intentions if that’s want you want.
- BizarroLand 4y agoIf we somehow manage to survive this as we have so many other enormous technological revolutions, I envision a future where children will be assigned a friendly AI as a lifemate that will grow up alongside them, having all of the knowledge of the world at its fingertips to teach and coparent the child into its adulthood and throughout its life. Once ubiquitous, these friendly AIs could negotiate salaries, mediate conflicts, help resolve relationship difficulties, help with timely reminders and be personally invested in that person's entire life, and after the child's eventual passing, would serve as a historian and memoir that could replay the great and wonderful moments of their lives for others as well as condensing the lessons learned into pure knowledge and wisdom for other AIs to help raise their children with. We could be a mere 60-80 years away from a humanity that is raised in the equality we have believed we all should have had all along, so long as we keep pushing. That would be amazing. Sure, there's some risks we can take a wrong turn and we most likely will take a few, but there's a great payoff coming if we can hold the wheel and steer towards that. I wonder what the effects would be on society if we did that? If everyone had a friend and a life coach and a mentor all wrapped up into one that is as near and dear to us as a teddy bear, that would never betray us, that would serve as a priest and a confessional and a therapist all at the same time, that was always there for us no matter what happened, backed up to the cloud so that barring nuclear war or the apocalypse could never be separated from us. I bet the people 100 years from that day would be as unrecognizable to us as we are to the Sentinelese.
- neuronexmachina 4y ago> I envision a future where children will be assigned a friendly AI as a lifemate that will grow up alongside them, having all of the knowledge of the world at its fingertips to teach and coparent the child into its adulthood and throughout its life. I'm reminded of Neal Stephenson's "Diamond Age, or a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age > The protagonist in the story is Nell, a thete (or person without a tribe; equivalent to the lowest working class) living in the Leased Territories, a lowland slum built on the artificial, diamondoid island of New Chusan, located offshore from the mouth of the Yangtze River, northwest of Shanghai. When she is four, Nell's older brother Harv gives her a stolen copy of a highly sophisticated interactive book, Young Lady's Illustrated Primer: a Propædeutic Enchiridion, in which is told the tale of Princess Nell and her various friends, kin, associates, etc., commissioned by the wealthy Neo-Victorian "Equity Lord" Alexander Chung-Sik Finkle-McGraw for his granddaughter, Elizabeth. The story follows Nell's development under the tutelage of the Primer, and to a lesser degree, the lives of Elizabeth Finkle-McGraw and Fiona Hackworth, Neo-Victorian girls who receive other copies. The Primer is intended to steer its reader intellectually toward a more interesting life, as defined by Lord Finkle-McGraw, and growing up to be an effective member of society. The most important quality to achieving an interesting life is deemed to be a subversive attitude towards the status quo. The Primer is designed to react to its owner's environment and teach them what they need to know to survive and develop.
- disqard 4y agoYour comment reminded me of this NYT article "Human Contact Is Now A Luxury Good" [0] It does seem likely that folks without solid pre-existing meatspace networks will be stuck trawling through an online ocean of Garbage PaTches looking for real human contact. [0] https://web.archive.org/web/20220609073819/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/sunday-review/human-contact-luxury-screens.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220609073819/https://www.nytim...