3 ms·
Just to be clear. Your idea is that something is art when it was made by a human. And a perfect replication of it somehow loses the trait, and becomes non-art?
by PurpleRamen 4y ago
Just to be clear. Your idea is that something is art when it was made by a human. And a perfect replication of it somehow loses the trait, and becomes non-art? This makes zero sense. This would make only the physical object itself the art, and it wouldn't matter what form it has?
- monknomo 4y agoOf course it makes sense - a print is different than an original, they have a different price, they have a different impact. Even when it is a very good print. For that matter, a limited run print has a different impact and value than an unlimited run print. Compare an original warhol print of a can of soup, to a modern repr print, to an actual can of soup, to an I <3 NY t-shirt.
- pixl97 4y agoSo digital art cannot exist?