3 ms·
Given all the idioms in C++, I don't think constraining the editor to one language is a bad idea *if* it caters to these unique constructs. E.g. I had a templat
by kvathupo 4y ago
Given all the idioms in C++, I don't think constraining the editor to one language is a bad idea *if* it caters to these unique constructs. E.g. I had a templated PImpl class [1] whose template parameter was the implementation. It was a pain to `grep` for the classes specializing it, especially when other classes extended this PImpl class (sometimes extending a specialization, sometimes not).
[1] - https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/pimpl https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/pimpl