He's doing very similar things than what other authortiarians were. Censoring what he doesn't like or doesn't follow his ideology. Problem is, the people who a

He's doing very similar things than what other authortiarians were. Censoring what he doesn't like or doesn't follow his ideology. Problem is, the people who agree with doing this before are mad because now it's against them. It's a positive. As for the NNs labels. Well, it's the typical scaremongering argument that holds no water when you realize that, again, people will be inconsistent about who they apply X labels too and why they should be censored. As for your ironic comment, it's really not. You can't call out hypocrisy on me because my stance has not changed. I'll give you the opportunity to speak and them. I'll call out your censorship and their censorship. I would've hoped the guy in the article and many who foam at the mouth about EM and NN realized that "censorship was bad all along, we shouldn't have done it because it can turn against us" but alas, it wasn't meant to be.