> Yes and no, while IBM owns Red-Hat, it doesn't dictate how Red-Hat does their own business decisions. Even that's true, it's now IBM's money that gets invest

> Yes and no, while IBM owns Red-Hat, it doesn't dictate how Red-Hat does their own business decisions. Even that's true, it's now IBM's money that gets invested. > Not in what concerns ISO C++ support, and if it was up to IBM, trigraphs would still be supported. I know about the trigraphs. That they were fighting for that shows imho exactly that IBM is heavily invested in C++. They have a shitload of old but hightly important code that can't be migrated realistically. So IBM will keep throwing money on C++ to extend its live infinitely, I guess.