4 ms·

This is how the self claimed god-king of the old namely Namrod and Pharaoh misled their subjects and claimed false deity. In the Bible (Old Testament) and Quran

This is how the self claimed god-king of the old namely Namrod and Pharaoh misled their subjects and claimed false deity. In the Bible (Old Testament) and Quran there are stories of Pharaoh during Moses time cruelly and pre-emptively killed all the Jewish new born sons based under the heavenly knowledge that he will be eventually overthrown by a Jewish prophet. According to legends and history, he gathered this prediction information from his sorcerers with their Genie partners eavesdropping the angels conversation because in the old days these eavesdropping activities was feasible and now abruptly stopped after the Quran revelation.

adastra22 4y ago
It makes for an interesting story, but you realize this has zero correlation with Egyptian sources and is almost certainly invented?
- teleforce 4y ago
  Time will tell whether it has zero correlation with Egyption sources and whether it's almost certainly invented. A simple search on Amazon on 'Egypt' and 'Exodus' returned several results of books written by the scholars including the following books [1],[2]. There is also a link to the video documentary regarding the Real Mount Sinai in my other comments. [1] Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition: https://academic.oup.com/book/25374 https://academic.oup.com/book/25374 [2] Origin of the Hebrews: New Evidences of Israelites in Egypt From Joseph to The Exodus: https://www.swrc.com/the-douglas-petrovich-collection-douglas-petrovich.html https://www.swrc.com/the-douglas-petrovich-collection-dougla...
  - RogerL 4y ago
    A simple google search reveals youtube videos and books on how the world is flat. It ain't flat. swrc is not a valid source of biblical scholarshp, Douglas Petrovich publishes fringe theories and is not someone you want to be citing for biblical research. To wit, he argues that the tower of babel is the only reasonable explanation for the number of languages we have in the world. He is self proclaimed inerrantist and creationist[1]. Why? Because God talked to him and told him it was true. This is not scholarship. That linked video (mine, not yours) is pretty interesting - he talks about being rejected in academia, colleagues won't speak to him, etc. He unfortunately interprets this as rejection of the Christian God, not because his 'research' is shoddy and unsupported, and takes it as proof that he is right. I don't say this to mock him, he is in tears at the end, but to point out he isn't doing scholarship and isn't considered a reliable source in academia. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJbY-y97Yao https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJbY-y97Yao
    - teleforce 4y ago
      Please do not conflate the case for Jewish settlement in Egypt with the flat earth theory. The former does not have enough convincing evidences yet to be found while the latter is straight up denial of the truth despite the numerous clear evidences. Please check videos of the Real Mount Sinai as explained in the Bilble (Old Testament) as being shared in my other comments and other sites.
kilolima 4y ago
There's no Egyptian record of Moses, Passover, or the Exodus. Religious fabrications are hardly relevant for a discussion of ancient mathematics.
- wankle 4y ago
  There are no detailed architectural diagrams documenting how the pyramids were built either. There were some papyrus scrolls discovered in 2013 which provide log information but still to this day, no details are known to exist. A citation is needed to disprove the information that you refer to as "religious fabrication". Lack of information in Egyptian records is not a citation.
  - adastra22 4y ago
    Yeah but a source which is itself derived from an earlier source (Torah) but the earlier source lacks the relevant details is a shut and dry case of fabrication. It is only controversial to say this because it is a religious document. (Lest you think I’m taking sides, the Jewish account of exodus doesn’t line up with archeological evidence either.)
    - teleforce 4y ago
      Probably the histrorians were looking at the wrong place and perhaps the original Mount Sinai is not the one that's widely accepted. Any knowledge be it science, history, etc need to be revised and aligned to the newly discovery with more robust evidences. Please check this documentary on the new evidences regarding the Exodus [1]. [1]The Real Mount Sinai - Shocking Exodus Evidence in Saudi Arabia: https://youtu.be/LZDfGiXJjjI https://youtu.be/LZDfGiXJjjI
    - pbhjpbhj 4y ago
      Do you have some specific archaeological evidence in mind (that disproves the [Biblical/Torah?] accounts)?
      - adastra22 4y ago

adastra22 4y ago

It makes for an interesting story, but you realize this has zero correlation with Egyptian sources and is almost certainly invented?

teleforce 4y ago
Time will tell whether it has zero correlation with Egyption sources and whether it's almost certainly invented. A simple search on Amazon on 'Egypt' and 'Exodus' returned several results of books written by the scholars including the following books [1],[2]. There is also a link to the video documentary regarding the Real Mount Sinai in my other comments. [1] Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition: https://academic.oup.com/book/25374 https://academic.oup.com/book/25374 [2] Origin of the Hebrews: New Evidences of Israelites in Egypt From Joseph to The Exodus: https://www.swrc.com/the-douglas-petrovich-collection-douglas-petrovich.html https://www.swrc.com/the-douglas-petrovich-collection-dougla...
- RogerL 4y ago
  A simple google search reveals youtube videos and books on how the world is flat. It ain't flat. swrc is not a valid source of biblical scholarshp, Douglas Petrovich publishes fringe theories and is not someone you want to be citing for biblical research. To wit, he argues that the tower of babel is the only reasonable explanation for the number of languages we have in the world. He is self proclaimed inerrantist and creationist[1]. Why? Because God talked to him and told him it was true. This is not scholarship. That linked video (mine, not yours) is pretty interesting - he talks about being rejected in academia, colleagues won't speak to him, etc. He unfortunately interprets this as rejection of the Christian God, not because his 'research' is shoddy and unsupported, and takes it as proof that he is right. I don't say this to mock him, he is in tears at the end, but to point out he isn't doing scholarship and isn't considered a reliable source in academia. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJbY-y97Yao https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJbY-y97Yao
  - teleforce 4y ago
    Please do not conflate the case for Jewish settlement in Egypt with the flat earth theory. The former does not have enough convincing evidences yet to be found while the latter is straight up denial of the truth despite the numerous clear evidences. Please check videos of the Real Mount Sinai as explained in the Bilble (Old Testament) as being shared in my other comments and other sites.

kilolima 4y ago

There's no Egyptian record of Moses, Passover, or the Exodus. Religious fabrications are hardly relevant for a discussion of ancient mathematics.

wankle 4y ago
There are no detailed architectural diagrams documenting how the pyramids were built either. There were some papyrus scrolls discovered in 2013 which provide log information but still to this day, no details are known to exist. A citation is needed to disprove the information that you refer to as "religious fabrication". Lack of information in Egyptian records is not a citation.
- adastra22 4y ago
  Yeah but a source which is itself derived from an earlier source (Torah) but the earlier source lacks the relevant details is a shut and dry case of fabrication. It is only controversial to say this because it is a religious document. (Lest you think I’m taking sides, the Jewish account of exodus doesn’t line up with archeological evidence either.)
  - teleforce 4y ago
    Probably the histrorians were looking at the wrong place and perhaps the original Mount Sinai is not the one that's widely accepted. Any knowledge be it science, history, etc need to be revised and aligned to the newly discovery with more robust evidences. Please check this documentary on the new evidences regarding the Exodus [1]. [1]The Real Mount Sinai - Shocking Exodus Evidence in Saudi Arabia: https://youtu.be/LZDfGiXJjjI https://youtu.be/LZDfGiXJjjI
  - pbhjpbhj 4y ago
    Do you have some specific archaeological evidence in mind (that disproves the [Biblical/Torah?] accounts)?
    - adastra22 4y ago