3 ms·
And conveniently, the solution is the editor that the author has already invested a lot of time into. What are the odds? PS, describing my comment as knee-jer
by EdwardDiego 4y ago
And conveniently, the solution is the editor that the author has already invested a lot of time into.
What are the odds?
PS, describing my comment as knee-jerk is unhelpfully dismissive. I'm always keen to engage, and always happy to acknowledge when I'm wrong. :)
- myfavoritedog 4y agoConveniently, the solution is the editor that thousands of developers have taken time to improve over decades so that the author didn't have to start from scratch. What are the odds that the solution involved a popular, mature tool that the developer could leverage?
- pwdisswordfish9 4y agoTo answer your question: > What are the odds? Very good, actually. You seem (and seemed) to be unaware how dismissive your original comment was. In fact that was the entire point of the response. To take issue with that response on the grounds it itself is "unhelpfully dismissive" involves layers of irony.
- pwdisswordfish9 4y agoDisregard this, I suck cocks.
- rhaway84773 4y agoThe odds ew pretty damn good. 1. You’re talking about an editor that has been popular across multiple decades and across many many generations of technologies. 2. The editor they’re already using obviously already does things in ways they like. That’s why they are using it. So the odds that their editor will perform the job well for them is also pretty high.