3 ms·

Sure, but that is a fairly obscure setting that I don't think merits your earlier build-up "Something as simple as...". On the one hand, I'd certainly admit Li

Sure, but that is a fairly obscure setting that I don't think merits your earlier build-up "Something as simple as...". On the one hand, I'd certainly admit Linux has "warts". It's GUI is perfectly usable and clear - it's more now what one is doing than the horror that is Windows 11 imo (and I'm working on that occasionally now). But the warts of Linux are accentuated by the OS attracting a certain kind of "OCD" user who will tell you how terrible it is for lacking X utterly obscure feature.

mboto 4y ago
I agree with the parent comment. This isn't that niche a requirement and its just one of huge list. Dismissing people's needs isnt the way to solve this.
- woojoo666 4y ago
  I'd like to see a comparison between, say, how many people want to customize their scroll speed (hard on linux, easy in windows/macos) and some other use cases, like how many people to sandbox and control permissions for individual apps (easy on Linux using Flatseal, hard on window/macos). Then we can get a better sense of how niche these demands are, and how well these desktop OSes support them
  - kaba0 4y ago
    > control permissions for individual apps Sandboxing is ridiculously bad on all 3, the best being MacOS. But this is one area where desktop OSs are simply way behind mobile ones.
niek_pas 4y ago
Mousewheel scroll speed is not a niche feature.
tom_ 4y ago
It's obscure on Linux, perhaps! Meanwhile this setting is in the control panel on both windows and macos. No shell scripting required.
LarryMullins 4y ago
Nah, it's pretty inexcusable for Gnome to not surface such a setting. LXQt's mouse configuration GUI lets you configure it, and LXQt has no more than a handful of people working on it. Gnome has more developer resources and could implement this easily, but they also have an attitude problem and bad priorities.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 4y ago
  Yeah, the clear problem here is GNOME and it's arrogant disregard for users... Which I guess really is historically in line with Linux culture, unfortunately.
  - Legogris 4y ago
    GNOME and Ubuntu are not representative of "Linux culture".
    - KyeRussell 4y ago
      “Linux Culture” is also similarly full of these sorts of “no true Scotsman” arguments, as well as deferring blame to other projects, and “oh you just simply need to use [package] Instead”. These are all things that make Linux on the desktop inaccessible. The moment you start talking about weird cultural minutiae like this, the whole thing is already incredibly inaccessible in my eyes.
      - Legogris 4y ago
        “Computer Culture” is also similarly full of these sorts of “no true Scotsman” arguments, as well as deferring blame to other systems, and “oh you just simply need to use [operating system] Instead”. These are all things that make computing on the desktop inaccessible. The moment you start talking about weird cultural minutiae like this, the whole thing is already incredibly inaccessible in my eyes. Seems approximately equally true and arbitrary.
    - int_19h 4y ago

mboto 4y ago

I agree with the parent comment. This isn't that niche a requirement and its just one of huge list. Dismissing people's needs isnt the way to solve this.

woojoo666 4y ago
I'd like to see a comparison between, say, how many people want to customize their scroll speed (hard on linux, easy in windows/macos) and some other use cases, like how many people to sandbox and control permissions for individual apps (easy on Linux using Flatseal, hard on window/macos). Then we can get a better sense of how niche these demands are, and how well these desktop OSes support them
- kaba0 4y ago
  > control permissions for individual apps Sandboxing is ridiculously bad on all 3, the best being MacOS. But this is one area where desktop OSs are simply way behind mobile ones.

niek_pas 4y ago

Mousewheel scroll speed is not a niche feature.

tom_ 4y ago

It's obscure on Linux, perhaps! Meanwhile this setting is in the control panel on both windows and macos. No shell scripting required.

LarryMullins 4y ago

Nah, it's pretty inexcusable for Gnome to not surface such a setting. LXQt's mouse configuration GUI lets you configure it, and LXQt has no more than a handful of people working on it. Gnome has more developer resources and could implement this easily, but they also have an attitude problem and bad priorities.

AnIdiotOnTheNet 4y ago
Yeah, the clear problem here is GNOME and it's arrogant disregard for users... Which I guess really is historically in line with Linux culture, unfortunately.
- Legogris 4y ago
  GNOME and Ubuntu are not representative of "Linux culture".
  - KyeRussell 4y ago
    “Linux Culture” is also similarly full of these sorts of “no true Scotsman” arguments, as well as deferring blame to other projects, and “oh you just simply need to use [package] Instead”. These are all things that make Linux on the desktop inaccessible. The moment you start talking about weird cultural minutiae like this, the whole thing is already incredibly inaccessible in my eyes.
    - Legogris 4y ago
      “Computer Culture” is also similarly full of these sorts of “no true Scotsman” arguments, as well as deferring blame to other systems, and “oh you just simply need to use [operating system] Instead”. These are all things that make computing on the desktop inaccessible. The moment you start talking about weird cultural minutiae like this, the whole thing is already incredibly inaccessible in my eyes. Seems approximately equally true and arbitrary.
  - int_19h 4y ago