3 ms·
A bureaucracy can't ignore the possibility of a deadly crash. But they chose the slow-down instead of spending the money needed for safety. Which is despicable
by joe_the_user 4y ago
A bureaucracy can't ignore the possibility of a deadly crash. But they chose the slow-down instead of spending the money needed for safety. Which is despicable imo. But there is the quandary that they know a modernization project could be a disaster just all American public transit projects tend to be disasters.
- danuker 4y agoReminds me of Atlas Shrugged, when they had to resort to manual track signal switching. "Physical men, serving as lamposts. You’ve advocated it long enough—you’ve got what you wanted’" (pp. 875-76).